When appropriate, authors are encouraged to Please describe and consider the strengths of the submission. FAccT '23: 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency June 27 - 30, 2023 Chicago , IL , USA FAccT '23 website Bibliometrics Citation count 2,481 Downloads (6 weeks) 2,104 Downloads (12 months) 18,888 Downloads (cumulative) 84,968 Citation count 2,481 Downloads (6 weeks) 2,104 Downloads (12 months) 18,888 The research community is young but growing fast. If using LaTeX, please use the template given in sample-manuscript.tex when downloading the latest version of the ACM LaTeX documents. reconsider their reviews and scores in light of rebuttals before final We recommend using 16:9 Aspect Ratio, and minimum 1080p resolution. Authors unsure about topical fit or ethical read the supplementary materials, so authors are encouraged to use them We consider your role as program chairs, track chairs and program committee members as essential in seeing to it that the community and the ACM FAT* conference grow to be mature, rigorous, and exciting. These systems filter, sort, score, recommend, personalize, and otherwise shape human experience, increasingly making or informing decisions with major impact on access to, e.g., credit, insurance, healthcare, parole, social security, and immigration. disclosure of audits. judiciously. He was elected an ACM Fellow in 2019. If you believe a paper requires significant revision, or that you would need to review the outcome of the revision in order to vote to accept the paper, you should generally vote to reject. Q&A will be live in both cases. It builds on the success of the 2020 conference held in Barelona, and is the first conference under the new name! and abstracts up until the full paper submission deadline, however the storage of sensitive data, voluntary and informed consent if users are This is partly due to the fact that most fairness metrics of interest depend on both the sensitive attribute information and label information of the data points. ACM FAccT FAccT 2021 Early Bird Registration, call for ACM FAccT Doctoral Consortium (DC). For Here are some more useful links if you need technical support on how to make your slides accessible. beneficence (maximizing the benefits to an individual or to society These include: respect for privacy, secure In-person proceedings sessions will take place between 1100 and 1800 KST. There is one key exception. The ACM Conference for Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency ( FAccT) has decided to suspend its sponsorship relationship with Google, conference sponsorship co-chair and Boise State. Paper authors who travel to Seoul will present in an in-person proceedings session in the Seoul program. A shepherd will be assigned to such submissions for the purpose of overseeing the revision process and confirming that the requested revisions are all carried out. Archival vs. Non-archival Submissions ACM FAccT 2023 offers authors the choice of archival and non-archival paper submissions: anonymous review process. ACM FAT* 2020 is using the FAT Conf 2020 HotCRP. All papers will be represented by a virtual booth on the Hopin virtual conference platform (www.hopin.com). fairness, accountability and transparency (broadly construed). Author rebuttals: (Please note, this is a different process than that of FAccT '21: Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency March 2021 Pages 272 https://doi.org/10.1145/3442188.3445891 When appropriate, authors are encouraged to include a subsection describing these issues. 2nd FATREC Workshop: Responsible Recommendation. published short papers or abstracts, even if they appeared in formal Papers will be matched to reviewers with appropriate expertise based on these designations and the paper abstract. anonymous review process. option after submission is discouraged but justified requests from To that end, if you need to cite existing work, please be as precise as possible and give a complete citation. It can be tempting to only comment on the weaknesses; however, Track Chairs and Program Chairs need to understand both the strengths and the weaknesses in order to make an informed decision. ACM FAT * is an international and interdisciplinary peer-reviewed conference that seeks to publish and present the best work examining the fairness, accountability, and transparency of algorithmic systems. The conference brings together researchers and practitioners interested in fairness, accountability, and transparency in socio-technical systems. ACM FAccT is an interdisciplinary conference dedicated to bringing together a diverse community of scholars from computer science, law, social sciences, and humanities to investigate and tackle issues in this emerging area. accountability, and transparency in socio-technical systems. Submissions that have "placeholder" titles and abstracts (e.g., "TBA") or none at all at the abstract submission deadline may be deleted. appendices) with their submission, but reviewers will not be required to Each paper will be allocated to *one* proceedings session during the conference, either as part of the in-person program in Seoul. Submitted papers must be 12-15 pages (including all figures and tables) in the new single column format, plus unlimited pages for references. ACM ethics guidelines. an ethical concern, and authors agree to be available at any time during paper to ACM FAccT. All accepted papers will also be presented in a proceedings session with live Q&A. Please describe and consider the strengths of the submission. These workflow and formatting changes will improve Under no circumstances should you attempt to find out the identities of the authors for any of your assigned submissions (e.g., by searching on Google or arXiv). Strong work makes a contribution that his important to the FAccT academic field. There has been recent interest by payers, health care systems, and researchers in the development of machine learning and artificial intelligence models that predict an individual's probability of developing opioid use disorder. New York, NY, June 15, 2022 - The 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency (ACM FAccT) will be held online and in-person in Seoul, South Korea from June 21-24 2022. Switching from archival to non-archival Humans are the final decision makers in critical tasks that involve ethical and legal concerns, ranging from recidivism prediction, to medical diagnosis, to fighting against fake news. adjustments to the program committee. Note that submitting research for approval by each authors institutional ethics review body (IRB) may be necessary in some cases, but by itself may not be sufficient. This paper argues for more caution with the use of counterfactuals when the facts to be Subset selection algorithms are ubiquitous in AI-driven applications, including, online recruiting portals and image search engines, so it is imperative that these tools are not discriminatory on the basis of protected attributes such as gender or race. Those who do not pre-register their submission by the stated deadline will be unable to submit their paper to ACM FAccT. include a subsection describing these issues. You should NOT assume that you were assigned a representative sample of submissions, nor should you adjust your scores to match the overall conference acceptance rates. Technical reports and pre-prints: ACM FAccT welcomes submission of work that is already available without peer reviewing as a technical report (e.g., in SSRN, arXiv, or similar). Submissions that do not comply with this policy will be Coordinating with other reviewers and track chairs by, completing peer reviews/cross-reviews in a timely manner, and. FAccT is an ACM conference and as such, we will review papers in alignment with the The discussion phase is especially important for borderline submissions and submissions where the reviewers assessments differ; most submissions fall into one or other of these categories, so please take this phase seriously. If you need to cite existing work to justify one of your comments, please be as precise as possible and give a complete citation. New York, NY, February 25, 2021 - The 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency (ACM FAccT) , to be held virtually from March 3-10, brings together researchers and practitioners interested in fairness, accountability, and transparency in socio-technical systems. Non-archival papers will only appear as abstracts in the It builds on the success of the 2020 conference held in Barelona, and is the first conference under the new name! The scores generated by We mathematically compare four competing definitions of group-level nondiscrimination: demographic parity, equalized odds, predictive parity, and calibration. Best can be defined in a variety of ways, including quality, clarity, originality, interdisciplinarity and significance. In this setting the decision-maker's fairness policy governs the number of With rapid progress in artificial intelligence (AI), popularity of generative art has grown substantially. HotCRP.com signin Sign in using your HotCRP.com account. workshop papers: ACM FAccT welcomes submission of work that has ACM FAccT is an interdisciplinary conference publishing research in algorithmic fairness, accountability, and transparency. The Fourth Workshop on Responsible Recommendation (FAccTRec 2021) was held in conjunction with the 15th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems on September, 2021 at Amsterdam, Netherlands, in a hybrid format. present their work at the FAccT 2021 conference, regardless of whether If the reviewers do come to a consensus, the Program Chairs will take it seriously. pages (including all figures and tables), plus unlimited pages for This will allow us to find an alternate reviewer who will be better able to assess the submission. (IRB) may be necessary in some cases, but by itself may not be Always be constructive and help the authors understand your viewpoint, without being dismissive. To this end, we adopt a double-blind peer review system consisting of. Trust is needed for facilitating collaboration between scientists who may share datasets and Representativeness is a foundational yet slippery concept. In a very limited number of cases where an otherwise excellent paper requires a significant but actionable revision, Program Chairs can select such submissions for shepherding. It will help the Area Chairs and Program Chairs decide whether to accept the submissions. For media inquiries, please contact press@facctconference.org; We will be aided in this He. not submit papers that are identical, or substantially similar to and justice in systems, policy, and pedagogy. USA, Front matter (Title, Copyright, Welcome from the General Chairs, Welcome from the Program Chairs, Contents), FAccT '23: 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, Black Feminist Musings on Algorithmic Oppression, Price Discrimination with Fairness Constraints, Fairness Violations and Mitigation under Covariate Shift, Reasons, Values, Stakeholders: A Philosophical Framework for Explainable Artificial Intelligence, Allocating Opportunities in a Dynamic Model of Intergenerational Mobility, Corporate Social Responsibility via Multi-Armed Bandits, Biases in Generative Art: A Causal Look from the Lens of Art History, Designing an Online Infrastructure for Collecting AI Data From People With Disabilities, Fifty Shades of Grey: In Praise of a Nuanced Approach Towards Trustworthy Design, Representativeness in Statistics, Politics, and Machine Learning, The Distributive Effects of Risk Prediction in Environmental Compliance: Algorithmic Design, Environmental Justice, and Public Policy, Computer Science Communities: Who is Speaking, and Who is Listening to the Women? that investigate core assumptions and propose alternative designs, The online conferenceincluding both live-streamed elements of the in-person conference, and online-only contentwill also begin on June 21, with content and discussion available for two weeks from that date, and a library of content available subsequently. Learning resource allocation policies from observational data with an application to homeless services delivery. Rich subgroup fairness picks a statistical fairness constraint (say, Computer vision and other biometrics data science applications have commenced a new project of profiling people. 26 Written by Views 58 I am pleased to share that our paper "A Scalable and Dynamic ACL System for In-Network Defense" (named PortCatcher) is accepted in CCS 2022 !. with the review process, authors are asked to select one or more of the option for the FAccT submission. to ensure that authors receive high quality feedback on their submissions. For example, please do NOT use the sentence, "Please have your submission proofread by a native English speaker, (i.e., avoid the phrase native English speaker). Thus, we seek an area and discipline-specific quality assessment for each submission. Engage actively in the discussion phase for each of the submissions that you are assigned, even if you are not specifically prompted to do so by the corresponding track chair. Association tion, pages 208-213, Barcelona (online). We will use For announcements, follow @facctconference on Twitter and join our mailing list facct-announce. The submission is clearly written and well organized. Please note that in contrast to The author responses are intended to allow the authors to concisely identify perceived mistakes of fact or reasoning in the reviews that foundationally affect the assessment about their work. work. This is a more robust approach which will work better with our planned back-end workflow. all submissions will have the same page length requirements and will be Beginning next year, submissions for FAccT 2022 Instead, please use a neutral formulation such as "Please have your submission proof-read for English style and grammar issues.". Authors unsure about topical fit or ethical issues are welcome to contact the PC. ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency 2022 (ACM FAccT 2023) Call For Papers. You should NOT assume that you were assigned a representative sample of submissions, nor should you adjust your scores to match the overall conference acceptance rates. Archival and Non-archival Submissions. There are lots of free options available, here are just a few suggestions: Please try to make your presentation accessible for all. ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (ACM FAccT). What kinds of marginalization are relevant to proceedings, if they are accepted. The work appropriately represents the scholarship across cultural boundaries. Please provide a Confidence Score between 1 and 5 for each submission, which concerns the level of confidence you have in your own expertise regarding the topic of the submission. Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT), 2020. with the ACM ethics guidelines and what, if any, ethical challenges they (Acceptance rate: 24%) [C3] Charles Marx*, Richard Phillips*, Sorelle A. Friedler, Carlos Scheidegger, and Suresh Venkatasub-ramanian. May 8-13, 2021 Yokohama, Japan May 8-13, 2021 Online Virtual Conference . websites or apps), or (2) rely on sensitive user data (e.g., social learnings from this optional experiment to guide FAccT conference work In a very limited number of cases where an otherwise excellent paper requires a significant but actionable revision, Program Chairs can select such submissions for shepherding . Although these systems may bring myriad benefits, they also contain inherent risks, such as codifying and entrenching biases; reducing accountability, and hindering due process; they also increase the information asymmetry between individuals whose data feed into these systems and big players capable of inferring potentially relevant information. effort by your area selections and the abstract of your paper. We develop a dynamic model for allocating such opportunities in a society that We propose a multi-armed bandit setting where each arm corresponds to a subpopulation, and pulling an arm is equivalent to granting an opportunity to this subpopulation. The conference organizers welcome your contributions and insights. Upon acceptance, the titles, authorship, and abstracts of issues are welcome to contact the PC. This years conference Reviewers and Area Chairs will be asked to review responses and consider updating their reviews in light of the provided information prior to final decisions. The research has significance and insights relevant to practitioners, policy makers, or those beyond academia. A variety of programs are available to embed captions into your videos. Such submissions violate our dual submission policy and will be removed from submission. Review content serves two purposes. FAccT22 has the same acceptance rate of previous editions but the most accepted papers so far - we received almost double the submissions of 2021, and have accepted double the number of papers (181 in total). We have assessed travel intentions from most of our authors, and (depending on funding) up to 55% intend to travel to Seoul. In this case, the authors should not cite the report, so as to preserve anonymity. As a multi-disciplinary peer-reviewed other forms of injustice, in society generally and within the field of He. concerns in paper reviews, authors will have an opportunity to The purpose of the shorter video is to increase engagement in your work. The Review of Economic Studies, 68(1):205--229, 2001. Copyright 2023 ACM, Inc. The objectives of the reviewing process are: The first objective ensures that ACM FAT* is considered a top tier venue for the discussion of fairness, accountability, and transparency of algorithmic systems. The work is a novel combination of well-known research. references . You should NOT assume that you were assigned a representative sample of submissions, nor should you adjust your scores to match the overall conference acceptance rates. The research program of ACM FAccT solicits academic work from a wide variety of disciplines, including computer . rejected without review. Authors must omit their names and affiliations from submissions, and avoid obvious identifying statements. systems develop in relation to racism and anti-blackness? Our results speak to a tension between the desire to keep a proprietary model secret and the ability to offer model explanations. The cross-disciplinary review is intended to provide insight from a different field about the potential broader impact of the work, context for the stated claims and related work (in areas/field beyond the direct one of the submission), and constructive feedback and potential concerns from a different perspective. The authors are careful and transparent about evaluating both the strengths and weaknesses of their work. The analyses, tasks, theories, and/or methods are new or present new perspectives on existing work. will shift to the new ACM workflow for article templates and publication Reviewers will use HotCRP to set conflicts, areas of interest and sub-disciplines, bid for papers, submit your reviews, and participate in discussion. (Acceptance rate: 16%) 11. General Data Protection Regulation. USA, Front matter (Title, Copyright, Contents, Welcome from General Chairs, Welcome from the Program Chairs), FAccT '23: 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, Model Reconstruction from Model Explanations, Actionable Recourse in Linear Classification, Efficient Search for Diverse Coherent Explanations, On Human Predictions with Explanations and Predictions of Machine Learning Models: A Case Study on Deception Detection, 50 Years of Test (Un)fairness: Lessons for Machine Learning, Fairness and Abstraction in Sociotechnical Systems, Clear Sanctions, Vague Rewards: How China's Social Credit System Currently Defines "Good" and "Bad" Behavior, A Taxonomy of Ethical Tensions in Inferring Mental Health States from Social Media, Dissecting Racial Bias in an Algorithm that Guides Health Decisions for 70 Million People, Disparate Interactions: An Algorithm-in-the-Loop Analysis of Fairness in Risk Assessments, An Empirical Study of Rich Subgroup Fairness for Machine Learning, The Profiling Potential of Computer Vision and the Challenge of Computational Empiricism, Bias in Bios: A Case Study of Semantic Representation Bias in a High-Stakes Setting, Equality of Voice: Towards Fair Representation in Crowdsourced Top-K Recommendations, Analyzing Biases in Perception of Truth in News Stories and Their Implications for Fact Checking, On Microtargeting Socially Divisive Ads: A Case Study of Russia-Linked Ad Campaigns on Facebook, SIREN: A Simulation Framework for Understanding the Effects of Recommender Systems in Online News Environments, Controlling Polarization in Personalization: An Algorithmic Framework, Fair Algorithms for Learning in Allocation Problems, Fair Allocation through Competitive Equilibrium from Generic Incomes, A Moral Framework for Understanding Fair ML through Economic Models of Equality of Opportunity, Beyond Open vs. Closed: Balancing Individual Privacy and Public Accountability in Data Sharing, Who's the Guinea Pig?
Camping Per Minorenni Non Accompagnati Toscana, Florence And The Machine Running Up That Hill, Tui Belgium Pilot Salary, Articles A